1996 Mazda 626 vs. 2002 Renault Megane
To start off, 2002 Renault Megane is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda 626 (89 HP) has 15 more horse power than 2002 Renault Megane. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2002 Renault Megane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Megane weights approximately 45 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda 626 (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Megane. (99 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda 626 | 2002 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Mazda | Renault |
| Model | 626 | Megane |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 74 HP |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 99 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2630 mm |
