1996 Mazda 626 vs. 2002 SsangYong Korando

To start off, 2002 SsangYong Korando is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 SsangYong Korando (138 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (104 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626.

Because 2002 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 SsangYong Korando (209 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (149 Nm @ 4300 RPM). This means 2002 SsangYong Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Mazda 626 2002 SsangYong Korando
Make Mazda SsangYong
Model 626 Korando
Year Released 1996 2002
Body Type Sedan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1840 cc 2295 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 104 HP 138 HP
Engine RPM 5500 RPM 5250 RPM
Torque 149 Nm 209 Nm
Torque RPM 4300 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 80 mm 90.9 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 88.4 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 4340 mm
Vehicle Width 1760 mm 1850 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1850 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2490 mm