1996 Mazda 626 vs. 2003 Renault Be Bop
To start off, 2003 Renault Be Bop is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Renault Be Bop (111 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Renault Be Bop should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Renault Be Bop weights approximately 105 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Renault Be Bop (153 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2003 Renault Be Bop will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda 626 | 2003 Renault Be Bop | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | 626 | Be Bop |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2580 mm |