1996 Mazda 626 vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (282 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 193 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 823 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Tundra (430 Nm) has 280 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (150 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda 626 | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | 626 | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 282 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Torque | 150 Nm | 430 Nm |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 2028 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5550 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3270 mm |
