1996 Mazda 626 vs. 2010 Mazda CX-7
To start off, 2010 Mazda CX-7 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda CX-7 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda CX-7 (244 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 155 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda CX-7 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda CX-7 weights approximately 513 kg more than 1996 Mazda 626. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda CX-7 (349 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda CX-7 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda 626 | 2010 Mazda CX-7 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | 626 | CX-7 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 150 Nm | 349 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1205 kg | 1718 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4681 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1646 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2751 mm |