1996 Mazda 626 vs. 2011 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2011 SsangYong Korando is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 SsangYong Korando (175 HP) has 86 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626.
Because 2011 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda 626 | 2011 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
Model | 626 | Korando |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1840 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 175 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4410 mm |