1996 Mazda 626 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Aveo
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Aveo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,840 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda 626 (104 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (99 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda 626 (149 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo. (130 Nm). This means 1996 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Aveo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda 626 | 2012 Chevrolet Aveo | |
| Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
| Model | 626 | Aveo |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1840 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 99 HP |
| Torque | 149 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4039 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1735 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1516 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2525 mm |
