1996 Mazda Carol vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Carol. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Carol would be higher. At 3,192 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda Carol | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | Carol | XC90 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 232 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3260 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1900 mm |