1996 Mazda Carol vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Carol. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Carol would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1168 kg more than 1996 Mazda Carol.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda Carol | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | Carol | CTS |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 314 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 610 kg | 1778 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3260 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1842 mm |