1996 Mazda Carol vs. 2013 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Carol. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Carol would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda Carol | 2013 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | Carol | Camaro |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 660 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 420 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3260 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1400 mm | 1918 mm |