1996 Mazda Familia vs. 1952 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1996 Mazda Familia is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Familia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Familia weights approximately 140 kg more than 1952 Triumph Mayflower.
Because 1952 Triumph Mayflower is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Triumph Mayflower. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Familia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda Familia | 1952 Triumph Mayflower | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | Familia | Mayflower |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 1247 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 37 HP |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 6.8:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1580 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1580 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2140 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 45 L |
