1996 Mazda Familia vs. 1994 Rover Range Rover
To start off, 1996 Mazda Familia is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 3,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1994 Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1110 kg more than 1996 Mazda Familia.
Because 1994 Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda Familia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1994 Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda Familia | 1994 Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Mazda | Rover |
| Model | Familia | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 3947 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 190 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 94.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 71.1 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.3:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 2090 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1900 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 93 L |
