1996 Mazda Familia vs. 2009 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2009 Volvo XC90 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 2,399 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 389 kg more than 1996 Mazda Familia.
Because 2009 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda Familia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Volvo XC90 has automatic transmission and 1996 Mazda Familia has manual transmission. 1996 Mazda Familia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Volvo XC90 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda Familia | 2009 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | Familia | XC90 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 182 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 93.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1369 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2860 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 72 L |