1996 Mazda Familia vs. 2010 Tata Nano
To start off, 2010 Tata Nano is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Familia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Familia weights approximately 380 kg more than 2010 Tata Nano.
Because 2010 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Familia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda Familia | 2010 Tata Nano | |
Make | Mazda | Tata |
Model | Familia | Nano |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 35 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 37 L |