1996 Mazda Familia vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 5,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 890 kg more than 1996 Mazda Familia.
Because 2013 Jaguar XJ is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda Familia. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda Familia | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
Model | Familia | XJ |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 464 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1870 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2105 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1456 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3157 mm |