1996 Mazda Familia vs. 2013 Mazda CX-5
To start off, 2013 Mazda CX-5 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Mazda CX-5 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Mazda CX-5 weights approximately 508 kg more than 1996 Mazda Familia.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Mazda CX-5 has automatic transmission and 1996 Mazda Familia has manual transmission. 1996 Mazda Familia will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Mazda CX-5 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda Familia | 2013 Mazda CX-5 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | Familia | CX-5 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 153 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 13.0 : 1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4555 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2165 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 56 L |