1996 Mazda Familia vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Familia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Familia would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1094 kg more than 1996 Mazda Familia.
Because 2013 Toyota 4Runner is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Toyota 4Runner. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Familia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda Familia | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Mazda | Toyota |
| Model | Familia | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1489 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 266 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 75.3 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83.6 mm | 95 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 2184 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1925 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 87 L |
