1996 Mazda Midge vs. 1960 NSU Sport
To start off, 1996 Mazda Midge is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 NSU Sport. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 NSU Sport would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1960 NSU Sport. (30 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1960 NSU Sport. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Midge weights approximately 456 kg more than 1960 NSU Sport. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 NSU Sport is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 NSU Sport. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda Midge | 1960 NSU Sport | |
| Make | Mazda | NSU |
| Model | Midge | Sport |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 583 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 30 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 516 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1450 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1250 mm |
