1996 Mazda Midge vs. 1982 Opel Rekord
To start off, 1996 Mazda Midge is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Rekord. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Rekord would be higher. At 1,689 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Opel Rekord is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Opel Rekord weights approximately 128 kg more than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Because 1982 Opel Rekord is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Opel Rekord. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda Midge | 1982 Opel Rekord | |
Make | Mazda | Opel |
Model | Midge | Rekord |
Year Released | 1996 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1689 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1480 mm |