1996 Mazda Midge vs. 2003 Mazda Demio
To start off, 2003 Mazda Demio is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Midge would be higher. Both 1996 Mazda Midge and 2003 Mazda Demio are equipped with a 1,323 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2003 Mazda Demio. (62 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda Demio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda Midge weights approximately 12 kg more than 2003 Mazda Demio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 101 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda Midge | 2003 Mazda Demio | |
| Make | Mazda | Mazda |
| Model | Midge | Demio |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 1323 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 62 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 960 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 3820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1510 mm |
