1996 Mazda Midge vs. 2010 Audi A5
To start off, 2010 Audi A5 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Audi A5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A5 (328 HP) has 261 more horse power than 1996 Mazda Midge. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Audi A5 weights approximately 788 kg more than 1996 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Audi A5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda Midge. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A5 (440 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 339 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Audi A5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda Midge | 2010 Audi A5 | |
Make | Mazda | Audi |
Model | Midge | A5 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1323 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 328 HP |
Torque | 101 Nm | 440 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 1760 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4000 mm | 4623 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1382 mm |