1996 Mazda Midge vs. 2011 Audi RS3
To start off, 2011 Audi RS3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2011 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 268 more horse power than 1996 Mazda Midge. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda Midge.
Because 2011 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda Midge. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 349 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2011 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda Midge. 2011 Audi RS3 has automatic transmission and 1996 Mazda Midge has manual transmission. 1996 Mazda Midge will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2011 Audi RS3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda Midge | 2011 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Mazda | Audi |
| Model | Midge | RS3 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1323 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 101 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automated manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
