1996 Mazda Midge vs. 2012 Renault Thalia

To start off, 2012 Renault Thalia is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Thalia (74 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1996 Mazda Midge. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Thalia should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda Midge. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Thalia weights approximately 28 kg more than 1996 Mazda Midge. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Thalia (105 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm). This means 2012 Renault Thalia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda Midge. 2012 Renault Thalia has automatic transmission and 1996 Mazda Midge has manual transmission. 1996 Mazda Midge will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Renault Thalia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: