1996 Mazda MPV vs. 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C
To start off, 1996 Mazda MPV is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda MPV (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. (89 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda MPV weights approximately 290 kg more than 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda MPV | 1938 Alfa Romeo 6C | |
Make | Mazda | Alfa Romeo |
Model | MPV | 6C |
Year Released | 1996 | 1938 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 3010 mm |