1996 Mazda MPV vs. 1941 Volvo PV
To start off, 1996 Mazda MPV is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1941 Volvo PV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1941 Volvo PV would be higher. At 3,668 cc (6 cylinders), 1941 Volvo PV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda MPV (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1941 Volvo PV. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1941 Volvo PV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda MPV weights approximately 300 kg more than 1941 Volvo PV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda MPV | 1941 Volvo PV | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | MPV | PV |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1941 |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 3668 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1490 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2880 mm |
