1996 Mazda MPV vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1996 Mazda MPV is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. Both 1996 Mazda MPV and 1963 Triumph 2000 are equipped with a 2,498 cc engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Triumph 2000 (130 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1996 Mazda MPV. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda MPV weights approximately 595 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda MPV (277 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda MPV | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Mazda | Triumph |
| Model | MPV | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2498 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 277 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1790 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2700 mm |
