1996 Mazda MPV vs. 1972 Zastava 1300
To start off, 1996 Mazda MPV is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 2,954 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda MPV (146 HP) has 93 more horse power than 1972 Zastava 1300. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 1972 Zastava 1300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda MPV weights approximately 740 kg more than 1972 Zastava 1300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda MPV (228 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Zastava 1300. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda MPV | 1972 Zastava 1300 | |
Make | Mazda | Zastava |
Model | MPV | 1300 |
Year Released | 1996 | 1972 |
Engine Size | 2954 cc | 1295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 53 HP |
Torque | 228 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1720 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4680 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2430 mm |