1996 Mazda MPV vs. 2004 Mazda 6

To start off, 2004 Mazda 6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda MPV is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda MPV (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 6. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda MPV should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda MPV weights approximately 445 kg more than 2004 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Mazda MPV is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Mazda MPV. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda MPV (277 Nm) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda 6. (231 Nm). This means 1996 Mazda MPV will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda 6.

Compare all specifications: