1996 Mazda MPV vs. 2006 Ford Falcon

To start off, 2006 Ford Falcon is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Falcon (220 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1996 Mazda MPV. (114 HP @ 3400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda MPV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda MPV weights approximately 260 kg more than 2006 Ford Falcon.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 80 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda MPV. (277 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda MPV.

Compare all specifications:

1996 Mazda MPV 2006 Ford Falcon
Make Mazda Ford
Model MPV Falcon
Year Released 1996 2006
Body Type Minivan Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2498 cc 3984 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 114 HP 220 HP
Engine RPM 3400 RPM 4900 RPM
Torque 277 Nm 357 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1790 kg 1530 kg
Vehicle Length 4680 mm 4910 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2850 mm 2630 mm