1996 Mazda MPV vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MPV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MPV would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden UTE (281 HP) has 135 more horse power than 1996 Mazda MPV. (146 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda MPV.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden UTE (350 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda MPV. (228 Nm). This means 2010 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda MPV.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda MPV | 2010 Holden UTE | |
Make | Mazda | Holden |
Model | MPV | UTE |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2954 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 281 HP |
Torque | 228 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |