1996 Mazda MS-6 vs. 2010 Holden UTE
To start off, 2010 Holden UTE is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MS-6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MS-6 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda MS-6 | 2010 Holden UTE | |
| Make | Mazda | Holden |
| Model | MS-6 | UTE |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1800 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 357 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
