1996 Mazda MS-6 vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MS-6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MS-6 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 638 kg more than 1996 Mazda MS-6.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda MS-6 | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
| Model | MS-6 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1800 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 318 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1778 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1842 mm |
