1996 Mazda MS-6 vs. 2013 Jaguar XJ
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XJ is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MS-6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MS-6 would be higher. At 2,995 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 744 kg more than 1996 Mazda MS-6.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda MS-6 | 2013 Jaguar XJ | |
Make | Mazda | Jaguar |
Model | MS-6 | XJ |
Year Released | 1996 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1800 cc | 2995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | W |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 335 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1884 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4600 mm | 5127 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2105 mm |