1996 Mazda MS-8 vs. 2009 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2009 Cadillac CTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MS-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MS-8 would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 508 kg more than 1996 Mazda MS-8.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda MS-8 | 2009 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
Model | MS-8 | CTS |
Year Released | 1996 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2000 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 307 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1788 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1850 mm |