1996 Mazda MS-8 vs. 2011 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2011 Cadillac CTS is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MS-8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MS-8 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 464 kg more than 1996 Mazda MS-8.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda MS-8 | 2011 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Mazda | Cadillac |
| Model | MS-8 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 270 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1744 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4859 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1842 mm |
