1996 Mazda MS-9 vs. 2010 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2010 Ford C-Max is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MS-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MS-9 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda MS-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda MS-9 weights approximately 70 kg more than 2010 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda MS-9 | 2010 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Mazda | Ford |
Model | MS-9 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3000 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 105 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1828 mm |