1996 Mazda MS-9 vs. 2012 SsangYong Stavic
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Stavic is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MS-9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MS-9 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Mazda MS-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 SsangYong Stavic weights approximately 303 kg more than 1996 Mazda MS-9.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda MS-9 | 2012 SsangYong Stavic | |
| Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
| Model | MS-9 | Stavic |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3000 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 163 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1923 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1830 mm |
