1996 Mazda MX-3 vs. 2012 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2012 Peugeot 408 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda MX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda MX-3 would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda MX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Peugeot 408 (143 HP) has 37 more horse power than 1996 Mazda MX-3. (106 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda MX-3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Peugeot 408 (240 Nm) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda MX-3. (134 Nm). This means 2012 Peugeot 408 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda MX-3. 2012 Peugeot 408 has automatic transmission and 1996 Mazda MX-3 has manual transmission. 1996 Mazda MX-3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Peugeot 408 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda MX-3 | 2012 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | Mazda | Peugeot |
Model | MX-3 | 408 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1596 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 106 HP | 143 HP |
Torque | 134 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4230 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2710 mm |