1996 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2000 Subaru STX
To start off, 2000 Subaru STX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP) has 52 more horse power than 2000 Subaru STX. (165 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2000 Subaru STX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Subaru STX weights approximately 510 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 2000 Subaru STX is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Subaru STX will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Subaru STX (224 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm). This means 2000 Subaru STX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda RX-01 | 2000 Subaru STX | |
| Make | Mazda | Subaru |
| Model | RX-01 | STX |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2615 cc | 2499 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 165 HP |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 224 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1610 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1750 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2660 mm |
