1996 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2002 ZAZ Wagon is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 167 more horse power than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda RX-01 weights approximately 355 kg more than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda RX-01 | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Mazda | ZAZ |
| Model | RX-01 | Wagon |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2615 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2330 mm |
