1996 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2003 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2003 Opel Meriva is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2003 Opel Meriva. (74 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2003 Opel Meriva. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Opel Meriva weights approximately 298 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Opel Meriva. (165 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Opel Meriva.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda RX-01 | 2003 Opel Meriva | |
| Make | Mazda | Opel |
| Model | RX-01 | Meriva |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2615 cc | 1686 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1398 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4050 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 52 L |
