1996 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2003 Proton 400

To start off, 2003 Proton 400 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2003 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2003 Proton 400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda RX-01 weights approximately 110 kg more than 2003 Proton 400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 112 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Proton 400. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Proton 400.

Compare all specifications: