1996 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2003 Renault Megane
To start off, 2003 Renault Megane is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 2003 Renault Megane. (114 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Megane.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (220 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Megane. (152 Nm). This means 1996 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Megane.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda RX-01 | 2003 Renault Megane | |
Make | Mazda | Renault |
Model | RX-01 | Megane |
Year Released | 1996 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2615 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 152 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |