1996 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2006 Volvo C70
To start off, 2006 Volvo C70 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2006 Volvo C70. (197 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo C70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volvo C70 weights approximately 557 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Volvo C70 (270 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2006 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda RX-01 | 2006 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Mazda | Volvo |
Model | RX-01 | C70 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2615 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1657 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2670 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 68 L |