1996 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2010 SsangYong Rodius
To start off, 2010 SsangYong Rodius is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 SsangYong Rodius is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2010 SsangYong Rodius. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2010 SsangYong Rodius. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 SsangYong Rodius weights approximately 823 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 2010 SsangYong Rodius is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 SsangYong Rodius. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 SsangYong Rodius (342 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2010 SsangYong Rodius will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01. 2010 SsangYong Rodius has automatic transmission and 1996 Mazda RX-01 has manual transmission. 1996 Mazda RX-01 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 SsangYong Rodius will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda RX-01 | 2010 SsangYong Rodius | |
| Make | Mazda | SsangYong |
| Model | RX-01 | Rodius |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2615 cc | 2696 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 163 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 342 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1923 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1920 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |
