1996 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2011 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2011 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (123 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2011 Mazda BT-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Mazda BT-50 weights approximately 25 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Because 2011 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1996 Mazda RX-01. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Mazda BT-50. (206 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Mazda BT-50.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda RX-01 | 2011 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | RX-01 | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2615 cc | 2604 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 64 L |