1996 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 351 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda RX-01 | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
| Make | Mazda | Volvo |
| Model | RX-01 | C30 |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2615 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1451 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4252 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1783 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1448 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2639 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 60 L |
