1996 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Sonic
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Sonic is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2012 Chevrolet Sonic. (138 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2012 Chevrolet Sonic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 51 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Chevrolet Sonic. (169 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Chevrolet Sonic.
Compare all specifications:
1996 Mazda RX-01 | 2012 Chevrolet Sonic | |
Make | Mazda | Chevrolet |
Model | RX-01 | Sonic |
Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2615 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
Horse Power | 217 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 220 Nm | 169 Nm |
Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4039 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1735 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1516 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2525 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 46 L |