1996 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2012 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2012 Ford C-Max is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,615 cc, 1996 Mazda RX-01 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 2012 Ford C-Max. (105 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2012 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Ford C-Max weights approximately 275 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 70 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Ford C-Max. (150 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1996 Mazda RX-01 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Ford C-Max.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda RX-01 | 2012 Ford C-Max | |
| Make | Mazda | Ford |
| Model | RX-01 | C-Max |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2615 cc | 1596 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | in-line |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1375 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4380 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1828 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1626 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2648 mm |
