1996 Mazda RX-01 vs. 2012 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2012 Kia Carnival is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda RX-01. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda RX-01 would be higher. At 2,656 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mazda RX-01 (217 HP @ 8500 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2012 Kia Carnival. (186 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mazda RX-01 should accelerate faster than 2012 Kia Carnival. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Kia Carnival weights approximately 924 kg more than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Kia Carnival (246 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda RX-01. (220 Nm @ 6000 RPM). This means 2012 Kia Carnival will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda RX-01.
Compare all specifications:
| 1996 Mazda RX-01 | 2012 Kia Carnival | |
| Make | Mazda | Kia |
| Model | RX-01 | Carnival |
| Year Released | 1996 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2615 cc | 2656 cc |
| Engine Type | dual-disk rotary | V |
| Horse Power | 217 HP | 186 HP |
| Engine RPM | 8500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 220 Nm | 246 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.4:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2024 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4820 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2900 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 80 L |
